I can’t help but comment on yesterday’s newspaper articles concerning our public schools. The Island Packet presented a glass half empty story, while The Bluffton Today presented a glass half full piece. Both periodicals presented the same information and yet both twisted the government data to tell their own story. What gives?
From the IP: Bad grades: Majority of county's schools post below average academic ratings on state report cards
From BT: Elementary schools close achievement gap, pull district up to average on report cards (page 8, Nov 15th edition)
You could read either report and make your own judgment call, but I have to give the nod to the IP here. Though both pieces were near vacant of named sources, the IP listed both BCSD Superintendent Truesdale and State Education Superintendent Jim Rex, while BT only quoted Truesdale and honestly came off more as a propaganda tool for the school district.
I think those requisite 5 named sources really could have made a difference here. What’s the school board got to say about these report cards? Or local government representatives? Parents, teachers, and/or principles of failing/excelling schools?
Lazy reporting only leaves me wondering.
DIY journalism anyone?
Friday, November 16, 2007
Good News? Bad News? Who's to Say?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment